🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of the West, other states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.